jueves, 26 de mayo de 2022

Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (First part

 



My response to the article between Botero and Cuevas

Albert Thirion



Cuevas and Botero by Thirion

Cuevas and Botero; Marchamo of Latin America?

I just read that Cuevas and Botero are the Márchamo of Latin America and that their works are parallel, only this remains in my memory, the rest is straw and ravings says it out there, a journalist, who does not see very deeply or does not know much of art, I think he is right only in one thing; in that the works are very similar, since both paint monsters and sick people, only that Botero says that for him his painting is a great pleasure that gives him great pleasure, that is what great painting is, A GREAT PLEASURE! , he assumes that what he does is "great painting", and suggests that it is very different from the work of Cuevas, he only suggests fearfully why does he not say it openly? Is Botero afraid of Cuevas?

Kunst & Ambiente Modern Bronze Sculpture - Dancing Couple - Signed Fernando Botero 

Obesity is a very serious disease , all diseases ending in "itis" are derived from it, the stupidest doctor knows it, and it is a great public problem, but Colombians seem not to know this... he only gives him a big It is a pleasure to paint fat people, this saying that painting is a great pleasure is said by Botero several times in the book; CRISTINA PACHECO: THE LIGHT OF MEXICO- INTERVIEWS WITH MEXICAN PAINTERS AND PHOTOGRAPHERS

 

                             The day spring came is an oil pastel by Alberto Thirion
 

As for his "style", painting fat is a very common resource, it's like letting your hair long or beard to have "personality", to be recognized to be noticed through this worn trick.

Despite his chronic childishness, Cuevitas seems to be more aware that he draws monsters, he just had the "great" idea of ​​drawing backwards (while we all strive to do it well) to make himself notable, stand out and thus make a name for himself, in some urinals and canteen toilets there are many drawings very similar to those of Cuevas , even better. Less unconsciously, I think that Cuevas is among the artists called to protest by art historians.

Reflections on contemporary art

Cuevas seems less bad to me, but of course I don't like any of them to be the seal of America, the Márchamo that gives us identity and name because that is art, right? The Márchamo of a social group or a country in this case We are talking about a continent, which is no small thing.

So I'm the best, and I don't have a museum, but I'm not asking you to, stay with your blindness and ignorance along with your 2 great geniuses.

Alberto Thirion 's Lost Items Compilation

Art and the World by Alberto Thirion

 


Does art serve to communicate beyond words?


Work in oil pastel on canvas by Alberto Thirion


Well, very good! We are going to try to see and understand what Art is for, and I repeat it.

First of all I will say that I am not an art critic, but an artist, so I can really talk about art with full knowledge.

Let's say with a totally practical and not theoretical knowledge of the matter at hand.

I say this, without the intention of offending anyone, much less taking revenge, for so many hours wasted reading all kinds of theories about art, in my adolescence and youth.

I think it goes without saying that here I am going to talk about art properly so-called, because today everything is "art" and everyone is "artist", I suppose that this confusion is due to the poor definitions of art in dictionaries, for the so-called class uncultivated media, which as we all know is the most abundant.

Well I am going to say it with a lapidary phrase, art is, a self-portrait and it serves to know oneself.

I chose to say it that way, because I am also lapidary, I don't say it that way out of pretended elegance.

..."Art is the highest verb of the spirit"... Hegel

Artists are hardly ever elegant because they are generally busy with more interesting things, this being said apart from the topic at hand. As you all know, artists are never elegant or almost never, now I don't remember, many that it has been.

I say this simply because I asked myself as I am writing this, and because it is not a bad thing to quote it.

I have fully verified what I say and affirm, art is a self-portrait and serves to know oneself.

That's all, whoever can understand, let him understand.

Now it only remains to add that the work that illustrates this article is mine, it is an American Christ, similar in essence to the Brown Virgin, the Queen of America, that is, it is a mestizo Christ, a mixture of Indigenous and European blood.

Although some Russians and Sevillians from Spain have told me that this is Christianity in their land. If this is the case, which I in no way doubt, we are before a Christ of the Earth.

Text recovery

Albert Thirion

 

What is the most famous work in the world? La Gioconda or the death of the devil?

 


This is just a reflection on art and advertising in our lives, that's all, although it doesn't seem like that to many, naturally

629397116_fa9fc7e5ec.jpg

Gioconda by Leonardo da Vinci

The Death of the Devil by Alberto Thirion



Recently a strong controversy has been created around the most famous work in the world, some remain faithful to the tradition of considering Leonardo's Gioconda in this way and on the other side are those who think it is The Death of the Devil.

The truth is that the Death of the Devil, in more useful, because it is useful for something, instead the Gioconda, to

what is the use?

The matter began as a game, but gradually grew, perhaps because the controversy has substance, if it were not based on logic it would have vanished into thin air.

My enemies claim that I have more skills as a publicist than as an artist, this is their opinion and nothing more.

It could not be otherwise, since as I say it is about my enemies, I believe that art should be spread, some of my colleagues think that a work is finished when they take it down from the easel or hang it on the gallery, I think the opposite, then, I think, it is when the work just begins, its active life as a work, that is, when it begins to be spread, known, admired or hated, advertising can be very funny.

Work on something, so that the devil finds you always busy. (St Geronimo)

Regardless of how substantial advertising may be from an economic point of view, thoughtlessness about what has been done, studying and digesting the work, to spread it, helps and enlightens us, to fully understand the created work, regardless of all this, he gets fun, as I say, by studying the audience's reactions to the play.

Mates! of course advertising is essential in our lives, why leave advertising in the hands of unscrupulous advertisers, selling garbage, as can be seen just by walking down the street a little, why not do something useful with it, come on, the spread, Death of the Devil.

Compilation of Lost Articles by Alberto Thirion

Man is his work by Alberto Thirion

 



Proof of this is for example; The Legend "The Devil's Backbone", known to all the people, is a popular, popular legend!!! Because he is from the town naturally

 


Work in oil patels by Alberto Thirion.



This is "The Death of the Devil", it is my favorite work, it gives me great satisfaction and great pleasure, Botero is given it by his works, painting is a great pleasure for him (he said that to Cristina Pacheco, the well-known journalist in an interview) I don't know why, I don't see any content in them, it is an inflated painting in every way, I was in his exhibition at the Rufino Tamayo museum, many years ago; naturally that "Man is his work" as an old wise friend of mine said. With regard to José Luis Cuevas, I don't know if his works give him great pleasure like Fernando Botero” and he is undoubtedly the hallmark of Mexico”, for being the most famous living painter in Mexico, and surely according to him, from all of Latin America, at least!!!

Now I remember the last comment that came to me about this work.

A painter left a comment in the guestbook of one of my virtual galleries and it says verbatim "Jesus does not even kill the Devil, Jesus only loves".

This is how your Christ is, and of course, I respect his way of thinking, not mine, my Christ does not tolerate evil, nor garbage, I believe that by tolerating so much shit the world is as it is.

 

                                             
 

I believe that in this world we are all between God and the Devil, as we have always been told.

Some reflections after "The Death of the Devil".

The press calls me “The new legend”, because their business is “the news”, I am nothing like that, they say that because I killed the devil, that I am the first artist to kill the devil in the entire history of art and things of that type.

..."The man is his work".

This is absolutely false, all of you killed the devil, I'm just like an antenna that captures what's in the air, giving it shape and color in a painting.

Proof of this is for example; The Legend "The Devil's Backbone", known to all the people, is a popular legend, popular! Because it belongs to the people naturally.

For foreigners, it must be said that “El espinazo del Diablo” is on the Durango-Mazatlán highway, this highway is of singular beauty due to its landscapes, the outline of the highway goes over a ledge on both sides and crosses the entire mountain range mother, the legend says that this is the devil's backbone because here lies the devil, not only dead but petrified by the centuries, so he died a long time ago.

 

                           



The spine is more than three thousand meters high and falls on both sides of the road, creating a truly beautiful landscape.

The devil is here dead because of the fight between good and evil, the fight was lost by the devil, because he did not allow man to live on earth, good is embodied in Saint Michael.

The beauty of this story is precisely in its popular nature, it is said that the voice of the people is the voice of God.

Compilation of lost articles by Alberto Thirion

I should be as famous as Coca-Cola by Alberto Thirion

 



"In advertising, the greatest risk is not to risk" Luis Bassat

The product that everyone needs Notes on my life and workAn interview with Alberto Thirion

 

 Interview

Upon entering Alberto Thirion's studio, he told me without further ado, "Know yourself, my spirit, the one that encourages my works, is the same one that encourages or animates my life and my body."

Then he added, as if to himself, I say this by way of discovery. And I think they are very good words to begin the interview.

JOURNALIST

Do you feel a greater responsibility regarding your work?

THIRION

I don't see it that way... I just draw, I say drawing, because drawing is the basis of all work, as the old masters used to say.

JOURNALIST

What do you think is the essence of your work?

THIRION

I am going to answer you directly, without giving it much thought; The essence of the soul of humanity, that is its essence.

JOURNALIST

Does your work scandalize?

THIRION

Definitely not, my work has gone almost unnoticed by the great majority, I am a painter of painters, those who like it the most are my fellow artists and intellectuals.

I have spent a good part of my life in those works that I consider the reason for my life, my ultimate reason for living, I think I was born to paint them! and I see no other reason, that God sent me to this world.

“Don't take yourself or your work too seriously. It's just fucking publicity." Neil French

JOURNALIST

I guess that's why you wanted to always stay true to yourself.

THIRION

You suppose well, I kept true to myself, apart from fashions created by the art market, styles, academies and other herbs. To be able to create them, to fulfill my destiny and my mission in this world.

Thirion thinks, gets up, lights a cigarette, looks out the window at the intense blue sky, suddenly turns around and tells me, staring at me, out loud, definitively!

JOURNALIST

Needless to ask you now if you consider your work important, but I have already written the interview questions.

THIRION

Let's put it another way, I think it's a necessary product, a product that everyone needs and should sell as much or more than Coca-Cola, which is a product...it's very good for your health, very good for your teeth, for obesity, it is very good for everything! as we all know.

The worst enemy of man is himself, this is easy to verify; ambition, envy, self-destruction, alienation, etc, etc, are latent in all of us.

Definitely !!! The death of the devil is the product that everyone needs, but very few have the courage to admit it, I should be very rich and famous, for creating this product, as much as the owner of Coca-Cola.

 

The death of the devil, is the product that everyone needs and not Coca-Cola.
Oil pastel work by Alberto Thirion



Alberto Thirion 's Lost Items Compilation

Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (Third part)


Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (Third part)

The most insufferable people are men who think they are great and women who think they are irresistible (Asselin, Henry)

Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (III)

Albert Thirion



                             The Lord of the Earth Work in oil pastels, by Alberto Thirion



Mrs. Raquel Tibol naturally seems to be very aware of this situation between Cuevas and Botero, when she says, as Jose Luis himself writes in his "Cuevario"" about me, he says that I am already old and therefore it is reprehensible that I continue to behave like a teenager. Then he says that what I said about Botero is the result of the envy I have for his constant successes. I have already said it on occasion: my relationship with this criticism has always oscillated between affection and hatred " .

In the interview that Cristina Pacheco published in her book "La Luz de Mexico", Botero tells Cristina that Botero is his real name and that he likes her, among other things, because in Spain Pedro Botero is the devil.

It seems that it is so, here is something about Pedro Botero.

The boilers of Pedro Botero".

Kunst & Ambiente Modern Art - Bronze sculpture - Mona Lisa, signed Fernando Botero - Botero statue
 

The name of Pedro Botero, is a way of naming the devil and consequently the hell that would be his enormous boiler, hence the expression Pedro Botero's boilers related to his flaming, physical and real hell.

There is no clear origin for the expression "Pedro Botero's boilers", also called Pedro Gotero, Perogotero, Pedro Botello by various writers in the Golden Age in various literary works

One of the first quotes in known authors is in the «Religious Comedies» by Tirso de Molina (1583-1648):

Santa: Me, brother? Does it say?

Gil: If you allow my Marica to return home healthy, the devils go to the alcrebite (an unusual expression for sulfur), where Pedro Botero beats them in his cauldron, I'll be happy.

Santa: Who am I to do such a big thing?

Llorente: She can get them out; [...]

Covarrubias and other authors give etymologies, but they seem clearly invented and refer to a character who was able to cook many Moorish heads (typical). And others say that Pedro Botero is synonymous with the devil because he, like him, is involved with the pitch (obviously he is supposed to be talking about the pitch that is used to line the inside of wine casks).

Greetings

Who and why, plunged art into ignominy, into the shame in which it now finds itself, art in the past in its great eras like that of the Italian Renaissance was a kind of priesthood for spiritual development, today it is the art of the fame and the wealth the one that to seated his real ones, the inconsequential and alienated art, accompanied by the publicity and the marketing is the king.

Cuevas says in his book "Cuevas por Cuevas" that he was discovered and supported by José Gómez Sicre, I find this in this biography" Very shortly after, he receives an invitation from the critic José Gómez Sicre and exhibits his work again, this time at the Pan American Union in Washington DC"

Here it is;

Jose Gomez Sicre

Cuba (¿?) Art critic and cultural official. He made José Luis Cuevas' first exhibition abroad possible, by inviting him to appear at the headquarters of the Pan American Union in Washington, DC in 1954. he Author of numerous articles on the artist's career.

Gomez Sicre was the one who made it possible, and he came from Washington.

The artistic quality no longer depends on the artist but on the promoter.

Luis Carlos Emerich tells us frankly, and he also tells us;3. José Luis Cuevas is considered the initiator of the Ruptura, but only for having established himself as a public figure at an early age, after acquiring notoriety in 1956 for his Childhood exhibition and for the publication of his text “La Cortina de Nopal” in the Culture in Mexico supplement of the newspaper Novedades, directed by Fernando Benítez since 1949 and significant for bringing together writers, critics and artists who constituted modernity at the time. In his article, Cuevas ridiculed the Mexican School; The substitution of Soviet iron for the very Mexican nopal not only referred to the confinement itself but also to the Stalinist orientation of its main spokesman, David Alfaro Siqueiros, and that of hundreds of artists who followed the unique route for art declared by the muralist in 1945.

Success is easy to obtain. The hard part is deserving it. (Albert Camus)

But how is this? I thought that Cuevas was also a communist like his idol, Picasso.

But here is something very interesting, in this investigative journalism article that I am now writing for the sole purpose of knowing my environment better and sharing with you the results of my investigations.

UNAM art professor Silvia Fernandez Hernandez tells us in her brilliant article on Santa Barraza. That while in Mexico Cuevas and Vicente Rojo, among the most outstanding, boasted of proclaiming that the Mexican school of painting had died, and that only the abstract art made sense, the Chicano art movement takes up Mexican mural painting.

How curious isn't it? why will it be?

Raquel Tibol "Living legend of Mexican art" recently honored commented; (Raquel Tibol also spoke of the supposed enmities that she has reaped due to her peculiar temperament): "If you read José Luis Cuevas, in his Cuevario , you will find the best insults that have dedicated, and we are very good friends. I slapped Siqueiros in the face and I didn't go back to his house because I didn't want to, because he invited me to come back, so I've had a life with sharp peaks, that's why it occurred to them to say that I'm a legend, but I'm an 84-year-old being, working, with two children, two granddaughters, and the world moves on”.

And later on, the journalist from "La Jornada" adds; The exhibition, installed in the single-theme room on the second floor of the Munal, brings together the largest production on Mexican and Latin American art written by Tibol over 40 years: 69 publications made from from 1961; 42 photographs from 1953 to 2007, in which the writer can be seen with Fidel Castro, Diego Rivera, Juan O'Gorman, Manuel Álvarez Bravo and Valentín Campa, among other characters, as well as letters from artists addressed to Raquel Tibol, some of their prizes and an audiovisual.

Apparently all his friends are people from the most grandiose of the left.

In the first part of these writings, the journalist who writes "Between Cuevas and Botero" says that they are parallel works, but recently Botero took sides against the Yankees, with his series of works on the Iraq War, with his series on Abu Ghraib, against torture.

Right? Well, as far as I can understand.

RECREATION OF HORROR. When Botero saw the images of the excesses of US troops with Iraqi prisoners, he could not help but reflect, through one of his arts, painting, the horror that it caused him.

Revolution Magazine asks

Revolution: How did you decide to paint these pictures about the torture at Abu Ghraib?

Fernando Botero: The whole world was in a state of shock when the American press exposed the torture of Iraqis in the Abu Ghraib prison. I read about it in the New Yorkerin a famous Seymour Hersh article. I was shocked, hurt and furious, like everyone else. The more I read, the more I felt motivated and angry, upset. A few months later I was on a plane back to Paris when I read about that tragedy again. I took a pencil and a notebook and began to draw. When I got to my studio in Paris I kept drawing and painting. It became a kind of obsession that lasted 14 months. I was just working on it and just thinking about it. Suddenly, I felt emptied, as if I had nothing more to say about it. I felt at peace. For some reason I found peace. But for months I felt this desire to say something, because for me it was a huge violation of human rights and the United States has been a model of compassion and a model of human rights, and it goes and commits that violation. That is the greatest damage that has been done to the image of this country. This morning I spoke with an Argentine journalist and she informed me that today only 6% of Argentines approve of what the United States does, when three or four years ago 70% approved. The same thing is happening all over the world. I'm surprised more artists haven't done something about it because it's a huge thing that's not going to go away. It is something to remember. I did it as a kind of testimony. I'm surprised more artists haven't done something about it because it's a huge thing that's not going to go away. It is something to remember. I did it as a kind of testimony. I'm surprised more artists haven't done something about it because it's a huge thing that's not going to go away. It is something to remember. I did it as a kind of testimony. Sure, I know I'm not going to change anything, art doesn't have that power. But at least I have given testimony of what happened. I couldn't keep quiet. The power of art is to bring something to mind and I hope my art does that.

To conclude with this already extensive article, I will only say that I totally agree with the great masses who watch soccer, movies and TV, etc. I advise you to continue to stay on the sidelines as far as possible from the alienated culture of our days, what do artists like Cuevas or Botero give us? How do they enrich our spirit? What are they for? I say Cuevas and Botero because this article is dedicated to them, but that is just the same: Pollock, Warhol, Malevich, and many others.

In short and to conclude, neither Cuevas nor Botero contribute anything new, their works are inconsequential, that there are many fat people, we all know it, obesity is a major public health problem, who doesn't know? Above all, there are many miserable, many forgotten, we all know it anyway, I discovered two important things "The Lord of the Earth" and "The Death of the Devil", of which my works give faithful testimony, so for my historical contribution the most successful artist the most famous is me, Alberto Thirion, in reality Google is well informed indeed I Alberto Thirion am the most famous painter, as the computer says, the second is Jose Luis Cuevas and the third and last is Fernando Botero .

Time will finally put things in their place.

Alberto Thirion 's Lost Items Compilation

 

Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (Second part)

 


..."Spiders never pee, nor parakeets suck"... Popular saying

Albert Thirion


Albert Thirion

Cuevas and Botero by Thirion (II)

Botero is more famous than Cuevas. Thus, because of Cuevas, Mexico is lost for being the center of Latin American art.

This is what Wikipedia says. Fernando Botero Angulo is a Colombian painter, sculptor and draftsman born on April 19, 1932 in Medellín (Antioquia). He is considered the most sought-after living artist from Latin America in the world today. Icon..

The emblematic figures of current Latin American art , says Mejía, and further on he affirms

There was always a common denominator between the artistic concepts and the works of both,

Veta Cuevas to Botero for not recognizing him

Jun 16, 2008 … The Mexican painter José Luis Cuevas assures that the Colombian found and made obesity a style thanks to him.

Www.reforma.com/cultura/articulo/446/891885/

I began to investigate a little about what is said about Cuevas and Botero, this is what is out there.

Saturday April 25, 2009

HAVAGE OF THE BITCH GODDESS

CAVES IN XALAPA

No one knows which artist is more repetitive and boring: Fernando Botero or Cuevas (is his name Fernando Cuevas? I can't remember anymore). An exhibition of engravings or something like that from Cuevas in Xalapa is being presented. The Ramón Alva de la Canal room is almost empty. The paintings? Engravings? they insist on repeating the same faces, the same bodies, the same grotesque figures that he has spent decades selling to some ignorant people. The exhibition is called, suspiciously, "Painted paintings during intercourse" or something like that. Title suspiciously similar to those of my books Tales for after making love, Tales for before making love, Tales IN PLACE of making love (The empire of women). Expressionless faces, misshapen bodies. What could be a provocation (paintings in which erotic scenes of great intensity were painted) turns out to be boring: nothing special, nothing original, a boring, bland sensuality. Cuevas enamored asked his new wife to apply color and indeed in the squares there is a yellowish tone that is repeated as a background, without nuances. I spoke with an admired plastic artist from Xalapan whose name I do not record so as not to involve him in criticism that could harm him before the institution where he works – which was, by the way, the one that brought the Cuevas to Xalapa – and he agreed with me: Cuevas no longer He experiments, he no longer takes risks, he fell into the pit opened for him by the Bitch Goddess, fame. And yet… he cast one of the most impressive statues of the 20th century: La Giganta.

Posted by Marco Tulio Aguilera at 13:47

Tags: Diary of MT, fame, Fernando Botero, Jose Luis Cuevas

            Kunst & Ambiente Modern bronze sculpture - Family - Signed by Fernando Botero
 

With this I remember that a few days before Lourdes Chumacero died, while in her Zona Rosa Gallery, seeing my work, she said the same thing;” Cuevas is the same and the same” , she was very interested in representing my work but she passed away, unfortunately.

José Luis Cuevas said in the Veracruz Gazette referring to Fernando Botero: "That's an idiot, I don't want to talk about that idiot

The Colombian plastic artist Fernando Botero has made 79 works on the torture of prisoners in Abu Ghraib, which he exhibits at the museum of the American University in Washington DC. Botero has stated that the reason for carrying out these works is none other than to “get rid of anger” at the “unacceptable” behavior of the US government.


                            The Tree, as a metaphor for life, an oil pastel by Alberto Thirion

During his stay in Washington, Fernando Boteromet José Luis Cuevas. Both artists remained there in permanent contact for a while, exchanging ideas and discussing concepts. Cuevas was an artist whose work, already defined by the particular approach with which he tackled his subject matter, was about to undergo a notable change in its plastic structure. A drawing of his dated March 29, 1957, titled Woman and man observing a piece of meat, clearly presents this transition: while the trunk of the woman on the left is a stain that barely suggests volume, both her extremities and the outline of the face they possess the express weakness and broken schematism of the period that he was beginning to overcome; for his part,Botero and Cuevas coincided at the time, not only in the transitory nature of their works, but also in the search that they both carried out ( Boterofrom Piero and Cuevas from his recently discovered Mantegna) to endow his figures with the plastic force that suited his expressive purposes. The man in the aforementioned drawing by Cuevas and Botero's character in El festin de Baltasar resembled each other in many ways in outward appearance. Not so inside, in the concept that separated one from the other: while Cuevas' figuration was full of pathos, Botero already showed signs of his unshakeable objectivity (12). From Washington, the Colombian went to New York to get to know the atmosphere of a city that was already the undisputed center of contemporary art in the capitalist world, taking that privilege away from Paris. Although he was already in decline nationally, 1957 was the year that de Kooning's abstract expressionism, Pollock and Kline reached the height of their worldwide impact. The Boatman who had been in Paris four years before and who had allowed himself to ignore Soulage and Hartung, was now shaken by the works of the Americans. Deep down, that tortured romanticism of his beginnings and a certain inclination for expressionism were still present in him. In De Kooning, the painter who most attracted him,Botero found fully realized what in Nolde and Orozco was loaded with dramatic excesses.

Reflections on contemporary art

I think these are the most interesting points of this writing:

In La enana (1957) Botero worked cautiously to avoid this inconsistency, but he did not get very far. However, in this painting his estrangement from Obregón was manifested as an important fact. A manifest distance in the abandonment of the fragmentation of pianos that, in the manner of Braque, placed all the details of the composition outside. In La enana, the head was the size of the thorax, but the parts of the face were in normal relationship to each other. The height was shortened by the expansion of the form to the sides, but this expansion was timid and ambiguous, avoiding the possibility that the mass acquired the form that the tremendous gravity of its weight demanded. Botero found, at this point in his trajectory, that all his efforts had led him to an area, never foreseen, in which the monstrous and the ugly flourished. His first reaction was rejection of the plastic system that gave these creatures their reason for being. Hence, La enana seems to us seated but in a way that her foreshortening does not define very clearly. A resource to present, justify and deny at the same time its anatomical structure. As a consequence of this rejection, the title of the work can then be understood as a literary pretext, behind which the artist hid to explain to us, in an unfounded naturalistic outburst, the evident deformation. The concern to avoid ugliness was resolved by Botero with the decorative use of color and with an inexplicable distance, in the case of La enana, from the monumental possibilities that the initial discovery theoretically offered. This was the origin of the new chromatic period that then began and the failed emphasis with which he tried to naturalize that humor that was already inherent in his figuration. In the same way that in La enana he tried to normalize contrapuntal deformations, in Don Nuño Bufón (1957) he proposed to give rise to the spontaneous smile that always welcomed his paintings.

12 The meeting of the two artists in Washington and the great formal approximation between their works during Botero's expressionist period, 1959-1962, has given rise to speculation according to which the figuration of the Colombian was derived from that of the Mexican. In the edition of México en la Cultura, Supplement for Always, March 10, 1971. CUEVAS declared, referring to the year 1958: “By that time I began to exert influence. The Colombian Fernando Botero, for example, 'premiered' his well-known style after seeing an exhibition of mine in New York in which I presented my Homage to Mantegna. Later, Botero received the influence even from 'hearsay', because he is constantly informed of what I am drawing”. I believe that the detailed analysis of the trajectory of Fernando Botero that I am testing here,

Well, very well, and what do people say? What do the people think?

because this is what is really important, the people are always right.

Question; Do you consider the work of Jose Luis Cuevas as a work of art?

According to Cuevas, the pictorial style of the Colombian painter Fernando Botero was adopted by him after being inspired by some drawings by Cuevas that he saw in NY. Photo: File/Excélsior

As I advance in my investigation of the work of Botero and Cuevas, I find more surprising things, like these!

And it is that as "Don Toño" says, Everything comes from money and everything goes to money; From 400 to 450,000 dollars, Latin American art for all pockets.

In my opinion, as a business, it leaves a lot to be desired. Football is better, Real Madrid paid 98,000,000 euros for Cristiano Ronaldo, this gives us an idea.

Obesity, a public health problem in Mexico

Of the 32 million overweight adults in Mexico, five million are at risk of becoming diabetic patients in the next five years, according to the World Health Organization

But Botero only gives him great pleasure.

Alberto Thirion 's Lost Items Compilation

 

Thirion Art: El artista Alberto Thirion es catolico?

Thirion Art: El artista Alberto Thirion es catolico? :   El artista Alberto Thirion es católico? El artista mexicano Alberto Thirion se iden...